Types of Leadership in Management

Top Types of Leadership in Management-Frequently Asked Questions-What are Leadership in Management Types

The preferable leadership style of an individual delineates their approach to directing, motivating, and regulating a group of individuals. Exemplary leaders possess the capacity to motivate their adherents to engage proactively in a multitude of social and political organizations. Beyond generating innovative concepts, they possess the capacity to motivate and encourage others to do the same. Upon juxtaposing their accomplishments, one will discern that the leadership styles exhibited by individuals whom one holds in high regard frequently diverge significantly. Scholars have thankfully developed numerous models and theories to assist us in recognizing and comprehending the various types of leadership. Check out these types of leadership in management to broaden your horizons.

Motivating individuals to collaborate for exceptional outcomes is key in leadership. As you grow as a leader, you’ll use various tactics to achieve goals and maintain motivation. Leaders employ different styles to motivate, execute strategies, and make decisions. Leadership styles reflect how individuals guide and motivate others. The term “manager” stems from Latin, emphasizing leadership, motivation, and collaboration. Leading involves setting a positive example, providing direction, and expecting high performance. It also involves helping individuals maximize their abilities to contribute effectively. Numerous philosophies on leadership and management exist and have been studied extensively. To learn more about the importance of leadership in management, read this article.

Types of Leadership in Management

Organizations whose leaders possess a strategic perspective supervise both the operational activities and expansion prospects of the company. This individual is responsible for protecting the working conditions of all others while assuming the responsibilities of senior interests. One reason why numerous organizations choose this style of leadership is that it simultaneously benefits a wide variety of employees. This type of strategic leadership clarifies all matters and provides employees with comprehensive delineations of their obligations. Here is an overview of types of leadership in management with a detailed explanation for your better understanding.

Strategic Leadership

Being a transformative leader entails perceiving oneself as the authoritative figure. Certain individuals may seek guidance from the constellations and the sky when they are at sea, but they seldom descend to observe the bustling ship deck. Leaders who are capable of providing guidance and profound reflection without issuing explicit directives will flourish in this style of leadership. Consider Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla. He does not ultimately offer any solutions, despite the fact that he may have a multitude of brilliant suggestions for bettering the world. Certain teams exhibit rapidity and require a substantial amount of motivation in order to advance to the subsequent level. These types of executives are an ideal match for the organizations they lead. Not at the front lines, but in the executive suite, is where they are most likely to exert their greatest influence over the organization they are leading.

Their apparent dearth of interpersonal rapport with their subordinates can be attributed to their profusion of innovative concepts. While leaders prioritize the present moment, managers who implement transformational leadership exhibit a tendency to be excessively preoccupied with future-oriented matters. Given their proclivity for motivating individuals with nebulous concepts, it is likely that their personnel may encounter difficulties in grasping their daily objectives. Without exception, the capacity for creative and unconventional thought is a vital asset to any team. However, these leaders might perform better in certain circumstances if they could control their personalities.

Transformational Leadership

In the 1970s, Robert Greenleaf coined this term to refer to an informal supervisor. He did it to demonstrate the viability of the concept. A “servant leader” is an individual at any organizational level who guides by prioritizing the requirements of their team. In order to foster effective servant leadership, the leader must adopt the perspective of their followers and make every effort to facilitate their personal and collective development, enabling them to achieve their utmost capabilities. The delegation of decision-making authority to individual team members is the prevailing practice in servant leadership, which is classified as a form of democratic leadership.

Advocates of the servant leadership paradigm contend that it is the optimal selection in the contemporary values-oriented society, wherein leaders ascend to positions of authority through the persuasive force of their visions and aspirations. There are those who believe that servant-leaders may be “left behind” by those who employ alternative approaches in competitive situations. Disciples may find the concept of working for a leader who embodies servant leadership to be an attractive prospect. Individuals who are not directly impacted by the outcomes might place a higher value on the organization’s transparency and collaborative efforts.

Servant Leadership

Transactional leadership thrives in metric-driven environments with clear objectives. Leaders consistently achieve goals, inspiring teams akin to renowned coach Bill Belichick. Monthly objectives strongly influence decision-making, such as meeting sales quotas for sales representatives. As a manager, motivating team members to achieve sales objectives is crucial, relying heavily on transactional leadership. Establishing common goals allows for exceptional performance regulation and inspiration. Types of leadership in management manifests in diverse forms.

The most difficult aspect of leading a transactional team is communicating your thoughts clearly and consistently. Such a management style runs the risk of conveying to employees the notion that they are mere elements in a larger mechanism. As a consequence, they will perceive themselves as expendable in the quest for purposeless goals. To prevent this from occurring, you must immediately inform your team of the source of these figures. Although your superiors may exert pressure on you to complete specific tasks, you must establish objectives that are reasonable and attainable. Always remember that being a leader requires balancing the requirements of subordinates and superiors in the chain of command, and that proper credit must be given where it is due. Notwithstanding the level of difficulty, the final result of your team’s endeavor will yield significant benefits.

Transactional Leadership

In numerous ways, the transformational leader and the charismatic leader are comparable. An example would be the charismatic personality exhibited by a transformational leader. Their primary domain of expertise distinguishes them from their competitors. A transformational leader’s primary objective is to establish a climate of change both internally and externally within the organization. Nonetheless, it is possible that the charismatic leader of the group has no desire to implement reforms. Transformational leaders may project an air of increased vitality across their teams as a result of the collective capacity they possess to motivate individuals to perform at their peak.

In contrast, a charismatic manager might place greater importance on themselves than on the subordinates under their supervision. Due to the association between the charismatic leader’s presence and achievement, the adherents might perceive the leader’s departure as a potential risk to the project’s or the organization’s overall success. A leader who possesses charisma must therefore be prepared to assume a substantial amount of responsibility and dedicate themselves to maintaining power for an extended period of time.

Charismatic Leadership

I highly regard democratic leadership as an ideal model. My aspiration is to embody this style of leadership. It involves soliciting and incorporating team members’ perspectives before making decisions. Those who adopt this style embrace innovation and are unafraid of risks. Nelson Mandela successfully employed this tactic during South Africa’s struggle for independence. He recognized the importance of economic advancement for his nation. Organizations closely monitor their personnel, valuing their expertise and wisdom. Introducing novelty stimulates interest and boosts productivity. Democratic leadership suits various team types and is, in my view, the most authentic approach to leadership.


However, implementing this leadership style requires consideration of several factors. It’s crucial to present yourself as a manager valuing employee feedback and maintaining open communication. At each meeting, demonstrate concern for employees’ well-being by attentively considering their feedback. Occasionally, you’ll need to make difficult decisions not supported by your staff. How do you achieve this objective? Despite occasional isolation, decisions must be executed; followers’ approval doesn’t dictate their worth. Reflect on how you communicate the rationale for your actions and further develop rapport with your team. Transparent communication is an essential element of overcoming challenges in this leadership style. Management encompasses types of leadership styles.

Democratic Leadership

This style of management is founded upon collaboration and partnership between superiors and their subordinates. These were exemplified by the sports instructors. From a managerial perspective, this approach is exceptional for directing teams. This leader invests considerable time and effort in becoming acquainted with each team member’s strengths and areas requiring development. In addition, they devoted considerable consideration to developing strategies to enhance their teamwork. Comparable to strategy and democratic leadership, this style of management places a greater emphasis on the development and achievement of every employee. A leadership style resembling that of a coach encourages followers to have confidence in themselves and assume accountability by granting them the appropriate degree of autonomy and scrutiny when making decisions. Consequently, an overarching sentiment of alleviation wanes. The supervisor is not under any obligation to possess expertise in every field and manage the show; consequently, employees are granted greater autonomy.

Coach-style Leadership

It’s evident that autocratic and laissez-faire leadership styles differ in extremity. The laissez-faire approach grants excessive autonomy to staff, with executives delegating authority to focus on crucial matters. They trust employees to act in the team’s best interest. Warren Buffet, a notable figure, implements this approach, preferring to collaborate with capable individuals. Despite offering general guidance, managers adopting laissez-faire may not always receive attention. This style suits seasoned, highly accomplished professionals best.

It is unfortunate that teams frequently experience confusion and discontentment when leaders fail to offer substantial guidance, if any. A leader is not obligated to meticulously consider each decision; however, employees require direction in order to perceive some degree of advancement in their task performance. Your team member might be unsure of the proper course of action or the rationale behind it if their manager fails to offer clear and specific instructions. This may have an impact on their job performance and their capacity to flourish within their culture. Clearly defining objectives and ground standards for the team to adhere to are optimal strategies for facilitating success. Although some degree of employee autonomy is desirable, granting them an excessive amount of discretion may result in feelings of isolation and uncertainty regarding their position within the greater context.

Laissez-faire Leadership

This style of leadership distinguishes itself by maintaining an unwavering commitment to traditional methods and protocols, regardless of their potential lack of efficacy in contemporary circumstances. The ability to regulate the dissemination of information confers authority upon bureaucratic officials, who employ additional tiers of control as a means to resolve issues. Additional controls are incorporated. This approach is most suitable for tasks that entail significant potential for peril, including but not limited to operating heavy machinery, manipulating hazardous chemicals, working at elevated heights, and dealing with substantial amounts of money (such as cash handling). Frequently, bureaucratic leaders will resort to extreme measures to ensure that subordinates adhere strictly to the established protocols.

Extreme control and rigidity can engender discontent among employees and impede an organization’s capacity to adapt to external circumstances in alternative settings. Our discourse on various leadership styles has demonstrated that these styles primarily dictate the individuals who are bestowed with the designation of “leader” within an organization. Each individual participant contributes a distinct quality that collectively influences the ethos of the entire group or organization. Various types of leadership exist in management.

Bureaucratic Leadership

Autocratic leadership is the most prevalent among the four primary approaches. In this style, the supervisor makes all decisions, and employees receive directives. It’s often used when urgent precise instructions are needed. Autocratic leaders, typically authoritarian, use their authority to achieve goals. This style operates efficiently in challenging circumstances, as leaders can make quick decisions when necessary. It’s effective when precise instructions are critical. One advantage is its ability to maintain employee motivation through fear or respect for the supervisor.

However, autocratic administrations face significant challenges. One major limitation is frequent conflict, as subordinates feel excluded from decision-making. Fear of voicing opinions hampers independent and creative thought. Another drawback is reliance on the leader’s judgment, with errors potentially leading to severe consequences. A military commander demanding unquestioning obedience exemplifies dictatorial leadership. Similarly, a CEO making all decisions without consulting the executive team highlights this point.

FAQ

Autocratic Leadership

If you cannot ensure that all individuals feel heard despite your desire for their input, opinions, and involvement in every decision, then participatory leadership may not be the best approach for you. Additionally, it encourages employee participation because they are confident you will attend to them.

Which is the most Effective Leadership Style?

Everyone is capable of developing into a leader. Any individual is capable of attaining the position of a leader. Although leadership is frequently expected in conventional work environments, there are numerous additional opportunities to cultivate one’s own and others’ leadership capabilities.

Does Everyone Possess a Leadership Style?

When a dynamic leader leads a team, team members undergo transformation. The leader not only delegates specific duties to each member but also incentivizes them to perform at their highest level. An exemplary leader possesses the ability to motivate and coordinate their followers toward a common objective, while consistently generating novel approaches to achieve that goal.

Final Remarks

The ability to assume the initiative is critical to the success of any organization and is an essential component of management. An effective leader must possess the ability to inspire and encourage their subordinates to collaborate harmoniously in pursuit of a shared objective. Additionally, the ability to manage difficult situations and make difficult decisions is essential. Leadership within the domain employs numerous methodologies and approaches. Determining the most appropriate one for a given circumstance involves considering numerous factors. These encompass the particulars of the assigned task, the competencies and personal qualities of the team members, and the overarching organizational culture. I appreciate you reading the types of leadership in management guide. Visit the website to learn more and expand your knowledge with other helpful resources.

Scroll to Top